Urgency on Reactor No. 4 at Fukushima

04/12/2012
From Ben Fulford's blog:
Urgency on reactor no. 4 at Fukushima

Dear Benjamin

I have seen a report of a former Japanese ambassador warning the UN  That if reactor no. 4 at Fukushima collapses, then it could mean a  Catastrophe not just for Japan, but for the world.

Please read this if you haven't already, and bring it to the attention Of your colleagues at the WDS if need be,

Http://Akiomatsumura.Com/2012/04/682.Html

Regards 

Matsumura is a shill for the cabal. I and three colleagues have each personally checked for radiation in dozens of locations in Tokyo, Gunma, Chiba, Ibaraki, Nagano etc. And never found anything except normal background radiation. It is fear mongering by the cabal . I live 200 kilometers from Fukushima and am not in the least bit worried. 


Benjamin Fulford.


I don't know about you but I trust a man on the ground with a Geiger counter more than I do CNN.  After all it was CNN who told us Saddam Hussein was importing yellow cake uranium from Niger prior to the Iraq war.  If there's a danger, its first for the Japanese and then those of us on the West Coast of the USA.

Radiation kills usually by destroying the stem cells in the bone marrow destroying the immune system. In the end its all about the immune system and fear can devastate the immune system too. The father of a friend of mine was a Harley Street doctor in London. He's spent years organizing medical care and aid for people near Chernobyl. Amazing man really. Much of that medicine involves bone marrow transplants. The body needs stem cells to repair  itself.

The USA was irradiated for years in the 50s and 60s by 131 atmospheric tests of atomic weapons and another 820 underground tests (that we know about). Did it increase cancer rates?  Probably. The government hasn't really said. The base rate of atmospheric radiation has gone up over the years.  The British once carved out piece of a  sunken WWII submarine off Scotland just so they could determine what  the natural background radiation baseline was prior to the atomic age.  Nobody thought to measure it back then.  I discovered not too long ago there was an atomic test 200 miles off shore from San Diego in the  early 1960s.  Nobody talks about that round here.

People who live in the Rocky Mountains or another granite rich region are exposed to small doses of radiation daily. Do you really want that granite counter-top?  Probably won't make much difference on your life span, but a Geiger counter can pick it up. Radon gas is an issue in other areas.  Then there's the issue of fish, assuming there is as much radiation in the Pacific Ocean as the media is screaming there is, what fish are in danger? I'd assume that plutonium, uranium and other heavy metals are going to be in the fish like Tuna and Swordfish which also concentrate mercury being at the top of the food chain.  Salmon eat krill shrimp, its what makes them pink.

I found this curious, why would the British create a dinner plate like this? The UK is a long ways from Japan. More propaganda?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2052784/The-sushi-platter-tells-dinners-radioactive.html